medium_Deep-waves-Digital-ecosystem.jpg

small_Deep-waves-Digital-ecosystem.jpg

thumbnail_Deep-waves-Digital-ecosystem.jpg

Deep-waves-Digital-ecosystem.jpg

Deep waves Digital ecosystem

large_The young man sat on the dock with urban skyline and skyscrapers in Marina Bay Singapore (low res).jpg

medium_The young man sat on the dock with urban skyline and skyscrapers in Marina Bay Singapore (low res).jpg

small_The young man sat on the dock with urban skyline and skyscrapers in Marina Bay Singapore (low res).jpg

thumbnail_The young man sat on the dock with urban skyline and skyscrapers in Marina Bay Singapore (low res).jpg

The young man sat on the dock with urban skyline and skyscrapers in Marina Bay Singapore (low res).jpg

BUILDING NEW MARKETS

With the UN predicting continued massive population growth in Asia, green bonds could help secure a long-term sustainable infrastructure for all [1].

Key takeaways:

![image-amundi.jpg](/uploads/image_amundi_260e00b843.jpg)

Asia’s fast-growing economies, which are increasingly focused on renewable energy sources and sustainable infrastructure, could be fuelled by the rise of ESG investing, according to Albert Tse, CEO South Asia at Amundi. ‘South Korea and Japan have pledged net-zero emissions by 2050, while China has committed to carbon neutrality by 2060. But it is not just an increasing climate awareness and the desire for better environmental quality that is fuelling ESG mentality’, Tse said. The vast trend of urbanisation is also playing a part. To put this in perspective, Asia is expected to be one of the biggest sources of urban population growth over the coming years: the UN predicts that by 2050 India will have added another 416 million urban dwellers, while China will have added 255 million. [1] ‘Asia is facing a huge demand for new buildings as more and more of its population move from rural areas to the cities, Tse said. He cites the case of a real estate builder in Vietnam who needed to issue debt to finance the creation of a new building. ‘He could either have issued a conventional bond or a green bond. The advantage of the green bond is that the finished building will be expected to have a much greener profile, with better insulation and lower energy costs. So, the added value of the building may be greater than a conventional one in 10 years’ time,’ he said. Drawn from a real encounter, we believe this example brings home the fact that someone investing in a project financed through green bonds effectively takes a more holistic stance that the value of the finished project may be higher because of the intrinsic green component, Tse said. ‘This is particularly relevant as Asian economies start to re-open and governments prioritise re-building in the wake of the pandemic,’ he said. At the same time, the Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in profound social consequences through the region: in particular, disruption to education, employment crises and the impact on healthcare systems have all increased social inequality which may well have lasting effects. ‘It has been difficult to find ways to invest in this field, and that is why we launched an innovative solution in late 2020. Our social bond strategy seeks to promote the financing of social projects to address these areas and we hope it will follow what we consider to be the success of our social thematic strategies,’ he says. Bonds dedicated to social projects present particular challenges, because many such projects are by nature small scale, often at the level of microfinance: for example, a scheme to help people in a particular locality. And this requires particular investment capabilities, Tse points out. ‘It is possible that in the wake of the pandemic, we may see companies investing in bigger projects on the social side, because of the greater inequality that will be evident throughout the region. We could, for example, see larger scale initiatives within education. But at present most of the projects remain small in scale. This is where Amundi’s size and experience enables the company to channel money secured from its international investors to provide finance for smaller projects that have the potential to have a real impact.’ 

## *Asia is facing a huge demand for new buildings as more and more of its population move from rural areas to the cities*

Sources: 
[1] United Nations ‘Around 2.5 billion more people will be living in cities by 2050, projects new UN report’

IMPORTANT INFORMATION Unless otherwise stated, all information contained in this document is from Amundi Asset Management S.A.S. and is as of 30 May 2022. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. The views expressed regarding market and economic trends are those of the author and not necessarily Amundi Asset Management S.A.S. and are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions, and there can be no assurance that countries, markets or sectors will perform as expected. These views should not be relied upon as investment advice, a security recommendation, or as an indication of trading for any Amundi product. This material does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, fund units or services. Investment involves risks, including market, political, liquidity and currency risks. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicative of future results. All investors should seek professional advice prior to any investment decision, in order to determine the risks associated with the investment and its suitability.

Date of first use: 30 May 2022









Why Asia’s green economy is growing fast

small_LiteracyMonth_20_Buckets 650_Large.png

thumbnail_LiteracyMonth_20_Buckets 650_Large.png

LiteracyMonth_20_Buckets 650_Large.png

![LiteracyMonth_20_Buckets 650_Large.png](/uploads/Literacy_Month_20_Buckets_650_Large_84002786a3.png)

Author: Carole Hodorowicz

It can be a challenge for investors just getting started to learn how to tackle debt, start saving, or find the best ways to pay off loans. Compounded by the coronavirus pandemic, addressing your financial situation can seem even more daunting when trying to learn the basics. 

We surveyed some of Morningstar's[ Generation Z and millennial employees ](https://www.morningstar.ca/ca/news/202904/generation-z-has-the-right-attitude.aspx)to hear their thoughts around money. Here are five lessons they learnt: 


**1. Paying Down Student Loans**

At the start of the pandemic, [the Government announced](lhttps://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/education/student-aid/notice-covid-19.html) measures to help students, including payment freezes.

There are pros and cons to continuing payments, and many good ways to make use of the money, like creating or building an emergency fund. If you contributed to your loans anyway, you reduced your principal. Paying down student loans is typically approached in one of two ways: [the snowball method and the avalanche method](https://www.morningstar.ca/ca/news/206124/how-to-paydown-debt.aspx). The snowball method prioritizes paying off the smallest loans first, while the avalanche method focuses on paying off the loan, no matter its size, with the highest interest rate first.

Here's how one employee took advantage of the grace period:

"As the pandemic happened and the government decided to set student loan interest rates to zero, I prioritized paying off as much as I could each month. I felt that I should try to pay the principal down since I will not have any interest eating away at my overall bill."


**2. Tackling Credit Card Debt**

With fewer ways to spend, some may turn their attention to paying down debt.

When approaching any kind of debt, you may be asking yourself the same question: Where do I even begin? Morningstar's director of personal finance Christine Benz recommends taking these steps first:

1) Buy yourself some time. Does your bank offer any options to extend a grace period or reduce your interest rate?

2) Make a list. How much do you owe, who do you owe, how much time you have, and what are the interest rates?

3) Pick a strategy. Do you want to go with the snowball method or the avalanche method

Here's a takeaway from one employee who focused on credit card debt:

"It's given me a new respect for that feeling of 'getting ahead' on payments. It's given me a chance to think more about my long-term savings goals--when I was so caught up in day-to-day spending, I didn't think as much about what I should be saving that money for instead." 


**3. Creating and Maintaining an [Emergency Fund](https://www.morningstar.ca/ca/news/206579/morningstar-money-challenge-day-7.aspx)**

The pandemic helped highlight the need to be financially prepared for the unexpected.

Our investment specialists recommend these tips to get a solid footing in the event of any unforeseen circumstances:

1) Tally up your monthly living expenses, from rent to groceries. Leave out the nonessential purchases.

2) Multiply these costs by three months. This is the minimum amount you should try to squirrel away.

3) See how much you currently have and set a savings goal.

During this time, many readjusted their focus to their emergency funds. Here's what one employee realized during this time:

"I believe that having a more holistic approach to budgeting is essential. Pre-pandemic, I was only focused on one aspect of my financial plan: paying off debt. Since the pandemic, I realized the importance of building up my emergency fund and having a backup plan in case of an unexpected occurrence." 


**4. Increasing Retirement Contributions**

The pandemic pushed some of our colleagues to look long term and consider how to stay on track for their retirement. Another effective use of the extra time and funds on your side is to focus on investing in your retirement plan. The earlier you invest, the more growth potential your retirement account will have.

Here's how one employee's priorities changed:

"After graduating from college during the pandemic, my biggest concern was finding a way to earn money. Now with a job, I am leaning into more savings, including a six-month emergency fund instead of a three-month and reaching my RRSP contribution limit."

It's never too early to plan for retirement.


**5. Cutting Back**

With office closures and stay-at-home mandates, several employees who responded to our survey said they are rethinking their spending habits during the pandemic. 

Here is how an employee embraced Morningstar's mission to think and invest with the long term in mind:

"I have been spending a lot less in areas that I would have normally spent on and putting more in savings. One thing I hope to do is work on finding a better balance between savings and investing and spending while not feeling like it restricts my lifestyle." 


5 Financial Lessons for New Investors

For direct exposure to multidecade and sustainable urban development projects in Asia.

Sustainable Asian Cities Bond Strategy

medium_organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470.jpg

small_organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470.jpg

thumbnail_organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470.jpg

organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470.jpg

![organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470.jpg](/uploads/organgutan_stepping_on_tree_branch_945x470_05664929a5.jpg)


#### Heatwaves and other extreme weather events are warning us to rethink our relationship with nature. The financial sector must play its part.


![peter-harrison-circle.jpg](/uploads/peter_harrison_circle_3ab1b11b7d.jpg)
**Peter Harrison**, Group Chief Executive


Because we don’t quantify the benefits of nature, we overlook them altogether. Johan Rockström, the Swedish climate scientist who I recently shared a platform with at London Climate Action Week, reaffirmed this point – that if it weren’t for nature we’d already have crossed the 1.5 degree threshold.

There’s a well-known saying in management that “what gets measured gets managed”: a cliché, perhaps – but frighteningly accurate in the case of nature.

The world is waking up to the fact that our global economy must become not just net zero, but also nature-positive. Heatwaves and other extreme weather events are reminding us of the fragility of our natural environment. That means knowing what nature is worth.

It took us 15-20 years to get the language of carbon – and the disclosures of carbon – to become an intelligible feature of company reports. Today it is virtually impossible to get good data around nature. But we haven’t got 15-20 years.

More than half of our global GDP is dependent on the natural world. Protecting and preserving nature can make a powerful contribution to efforts to mitigate climate change. And there is a social imperative too: unless natural climate solutions create positive social impacts for local citizens and communities living on the land, they won’t be sustainable. Investors must partner broadly and deeply.

The response must be vigorous. As a company, we learned that to make meaningful change on diversity and inclusion would involve a revolution in our culture. The same root-and-branch revision is required in our approach to nature.

Asset managers, in particular, have to fundamentally change the way they operate.

At Schroders, we are taking a three-pronged approach. We have pledged to change the behaviour toward nature of every company we invest in; we will create new nature-based investment products, and use our solutions business to channel capital into new and existing funds. By doing so, we help our clients make a positive impact while also diversifying the sources of their returns.

Just as with net zero, the role of the financial sector in efforts to halt and reverse nature loss is both clear and critical. Following the recent delay of the United Nations biodiversity summit, COP15, to December this year, we must use these months to bring more of the finance sector to the table. There is no time to waste.

Action on nature starts with action to end deforestation. The IPCC estimates that “agriculture, forestry and other land use” contributes 22% to global emissions and half of that (11%) is from deforestation and land conversion.

That means getting measurement and data right. At Schroders, we’ve built a deforestation scorecard to look at exposure to and management of deforestation risk for companies. And we have made natural capital and biodiversity a priority for active engagement with companies.

Deforestation is increasingly an investment risk, but nature is also a significant investment opportunity. Natural climate solutions are efforts to conserve, restore or improve ecosystems in order to absorb and store carbon from the atmosphere. Analysis has estimated that these solutions have the potential to provide around a third of the climate action needed to achieve the Paris Agreement goals and avoid the worst effects of climate change.

One statistic starkly captures the issue: they may be a third of the solution, but today, natural climate solutions receive less than 3% of all global climate finance. How do we close that gap?

I believe that we can create a tipping point, and accelerate investment.

The investment case gets stronger by the day, rooted in the price of carbon credits. Demand for high-quality carbon offsets is set to grow exponentially, driven by national net-zero ambitions alongside major private sector commitments. This opportunity is underpinned by increasingly sophisticated data and tools that are allowing us to start to value the world’s natural assets.

While supply of projects remains a challenge, the growing demand and activity in this space is creating new opportunities to institutionalise project financing, structuring and development.

Schroders is excited to go into partnership with Conservation International with plans to create one of the first dedicated natural capital impact investment managers in Singapore. Called Akaria Natural Capital, the venture aims to achieve the scale and expertise to deploy with impact – and contribute new ideas for how to solve some of the bottlenecks for funding. 

Getting to grips with the social imperatives around nature action is fundamental to this partnership, to ensure these investments work for people, as well as places.

What’s exciting is the increasing collective momentum of the investment industry on this agenda. There are now $21 billion assets under management in natural climate solutions – doubling in the last five years. The Natural Capital Investment Alliance, launched by the Prince of Wales at COP26, is an important step in this shift. The 15 members of this group all have, or will have, investment vehicles that help channel capital into nature-focused projects.

The energy transition is complex. The transition to a nature-positive world will be fiendishly difficult. But it is imperative, urgent, and we have to make it investible. That’s why as we look ahead to the second half of the year, the financial sector must join the chorus of actors stepping up to take action on nature.






Peter Harrison: why we must make nature investible

large_AdobeStock_386831297.jpg

medium_AdobeStock_386831297.jpg

small_AdobeStock_386831297.jpg

thumbnail_AdobeStock_386831297.jpg

AdobeStock_386831297.jpg

Author: Matt Toms, CFA  Global Chief Investment Officer

### While growth in the U.S and globally is expected to cool from its torrid pace in 1H21, fundamentals remain broadly positive and opportunities could arise in any meaningful bout of spread volatility.

Global growth appears to have peaked, with China clearly slowing and U.S. and European growth resilient but marginally softer. Easy base effects have largely passed, and ongoing pockets of COVID-related weakness continue to take their toll, particularly consumer expectation indicators. Among the major economies, U.S. growth remains the leader, due in part to less stringency on lockdowns and a general consumer willingness to largely maintain activity levels despite a resurgence in COVID cases.

While growth expectations in the U.S. remain resilient, headwinds have emerged, leading to lower revisions for Q3. Consumer spending has cooled as stimulus has expired and the Delta variant has led to a pullback in services-oriented spending such as restaurants, airfare, and hotels; with that said, the latest retail sales print highlighted a rebound in goods spending (excluding autos). Housing investment has also cooled as lack of inventory and high prices have offset sustained low mortgage rates. Elsewhere, uncertainty around the timing and composition of fiscal stimulus coming out of Washington has increased as lawmakers debate how to fund investment. This is notable as fiscal spending is expected to be a key source of sustaining above-trend growth. Despite these headwinds, we expect the Fed will likely begin tapering in November or December of this year, barring any meaningful payroll misses. While Fed Chair Powell has reiterated that the end of taper was de-linked from the initiation of rate hikes, an earlier end to tapering would give the Fed an option to pull rate hikes forward, if necessary.

With the potential of spread volatility in the near term, we have begun taking some chips off the table where we believe further upside is limited. This includes taking gains in select areas of CMBS and Non-Agency RMBS; we remain overweight Securitized broadly compared to corporate credit. However, given corporate fundamentals look strong, we would view bouts of spread widening as opportunities to add higher quality risk in sectors such as investment grade and BB-rated high yield corporates. We remain more cautious on emerging markets given the potential contagion from China and the Evergrande debacle. With growth expected to slow and inflation potentially peaking, we do not expect a meaningful move higher in U.S. interest rates, and have therefore reduced our short-duration posture across portfolios.

## Bond Market Outlook

**Global Rates:** Policy rates stay to stay low over the near term as investors digest growth, monetary policy outlook post-reopening rebound

**Global Currencies:** U.S. dollar to remain resilient vs DM, EM currencies

**Investment Grade:** Near-term outlook for IG credit remains positive, but valuations warrant defensive positioning

**High Yield:** Overall we remain neutral as fundamentals feel a touch softer

**Securitized:** Prefer areas in CMBS, CLOs where yield opportunities remain; residential credit still facing prepayment headwinds

**Emerging Markets:** Global economic strength helped, and will likely continue to help EM overall, although unsynchronized growth within the cohort is also an ongoing factor

## Rates, Spreads and Yields

![Figure 1_115.png](/uploads/Figure_1_115_0a65298d77.png)

As of 08/31/21. Source: Bloomberg, Bloomberg/Barclays and JP Morgan. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

## Sector Outlooks

#### Global Rates and Currencies

Inflation data remains firm, but the peak has probably past, in our view. Monthly readings have been decelerating since April and the YoY rate likely peaked in June. However, lingering impacts from supply disruptions seem likely to intersect with firming shelter inflation, which has some transient influences through supply, but structural support from still-firming wage growth.

In Europe, reopening has gained ground with the PMI now surpassing the U.S. Indeed, European activity remained resilient, while services activity in the U.S. slowed due to weaker demand and staffing issues. Within Europe, the services PMI has now overtaken the somewhat supply constrained manufacturing PMI. Similar to the U.S., reopening frictions have contributed to higher inflation in Europe, but the odds of stickiness seem lower than in the U.S. And while recent ECB commentary opened the door to some slowing of pandemic QE purchases in September, leadership probably does not favor a meaningful retracement of the recent step-up in purchases. The remaining PEPP allocation appears to necessitate a taper at some point which may lessen the signaling value of any action. The ECB’s Chief Economist Lane recently argued that the PEPP should be used to maintain favorable financing conditions while downside risks remain. In contrast, he suggested that the APP should be used to address the inflation gap vs. projections and differences in bond supply and demand. If needed, a slower PEPP purchase pace could be countered if needed by increases in the APP program, which still needs to be defined in the context of the new ECB 2% symmetrical inflation framework.

#### Investment Grade (IG) Corporates

Heavy supply at the beginning of August contributed to a slight sell-off, but as expectations for lighter September volumes began to form, investors stepped back in. Also, the move higher in interest rates attracted demand from yield-based buyers. A mixed bag of economic numbers increased concerns around the Delta variant’s impact on the reopening trade. However, while the pause in momentum likely gives the FED cover to maintain a dovish stance, comments from Jackson Hole suggest they are still on target for tapering asset purchases this year. While our near-term outlook for credit remains positive, we keep our strategic and tactical rating at Neutral. Seasonally heavy supply in September may provide an opportunity to add some IG risk at the margin. We see the most value in 7- to 10-year bonds with the long-end of the Treasury curve flattening. Sector wise, we like Telecoms, Utilities and Technology.

#### High Yield Corporates

In a reversal from July, August supply was very heavy early-on, but a slowdown late in the month saw the technical environment improve materially once the flow abated. Higher credit rated issues outperformed a bit as Treasuries settled into a comfortable range and CCC's lagged slightly on Delta concerns. While new supply mercifully shut down from the heavy volume earlier in August, we expect the onslaught to return in September. With year-over-year positive comparables easing - mostly due to Delta, supply chain issues and cost increases for nearly every input - there still seems to be enough pricing power to maintain or even improve margins. Indeed, ratings are trending positively and the default rate is near zero. While the Delta wave is slowing in the Sunbelt, it seems inevitable it will follow seasonal patterns and make its way northward. Oil has bounced back nicely and Natural Gas remains strong. We see the likelihood of continued positive "event-risk" as legacy names get upgraded or taken out.

#### Securitized Assets

Agency MBS underperformed Treasuries as investors remained cautious on the sector due to taper risk. Technicals were biased towards more MBS issuance while banks continue to add MBS at a much slower pace. Although spreads are expected to widen as FED tapering approaches, bank buying should support mortgages and continued strong-roll financing should help mortgages out-carry Treasuries in the near-term. Additionally, prepayment speeds are slowing and dampened taper talk from the Fed meeting should renew appetite for MBS outside the Fed if rates can stabilize.

We continue to carry a negative outlook for Mortgage Credit, but with a different qualification than earlier in the Spring. With prepayment and call risk still issues for total return driven market participants, the space is poised to continue to lag. Add in significant supply spillover from overloaded GSEs, elevated Prime Jumbo issuance and a better focused non-QM ecosystem, RMBS can add technically induced sloppiness to prepay risk catalyzed negatives.

CMBS's strong start to the year, which extended well into the summer, appears to be cooling with the approaching Fall temperatures. Although credit appetite is deep and perceptions of risk have shifted definitively lower, the now-tighter spreads offer less room to move lower and the path of least resistance favors spread-widening. While euphoria from the vaccines, reopening, etc., is fading, sentiment is weaker heading into a period of what is expected to be elevated issuance. As spreads in competing risk sectors continue to rally, CMBS cheapness remains and this becomes clearer as fundamentals continue to evolve mostly favorably.

With lots of deals working their way through the system this month, a potential source of stress on market conditions, we think they are nonetheless likely to do reasonably well given liquidity conditions. Non-benchmark ABS will continue to perform well fundamentally and command strong sponsorship from money managers with low-vol, low-return seeking strategies. However, with spreads now at, or through, pre-COVID tights after a strong June, outperformance is likely to be limited, with returns coming from carry and idiosyncratic tightening from ratings upgrades. We maintain our assessment as positive and increase our conviction. The fiscally improved profile of the US consumer coupled with ABS structural dynamics were already believed to provide the sector with solid footing to withstand this sustained period of elevated, albeit improving, unemployment. Indeed, recently enacted stimulus is acting as a fortifying bridge to the end of the pandemic.

#### Emerging Market (EM) Debt

The momentum and strength of the US economy coupled with the gradual re-opening in Europe continued to be supportive of the global recovery, however regional divergences in consumption patterns remain. Nonetheless, we expect global capital flows to EMs will correlate to favorable global financial conditions. The multi-speed and unsynchronized EM growth rebound is expected to continue, along with a strong rebound in goods trade as demand picks up, but supply chain uncertainties are a concern. Headline inflation continues to rise due to consumer demand, forex pass-through and higher commodity prices. EM corporates continued to see earnings improvement, led by commodity producers that benefited from rebounding oil and metal prices.

Positioning for a Growth Slowdown in Q3

medium_franklin templeton.jpg

small_franklin templeton.jpg

thumbnail_franklin templeton.jpg

franklin templeton.jpg

# Preview

Our definition of assets and their economic value has been changing over time. In the 20th century, machines, factories, and transportation were the assets on a company’s balance sheet. Today, value is dominated by intangibles. Brands, technologies, patents, copyrights, synergies, and business models determine the lion’s share of company worth. At this point, 90% of the capitalization of the S&P 500 Index is accounted for by intangibles(1), a huge jump from 36% in 1985.

This paper builds on the technological innovation and taxation themes presented in Deep Water Waves, a paper published by the Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, to explore the definition of intangible assets and draws conclusions on the implications for investors. Further, the paper dovetails with the Investment Institute’s Franklin Templeton Thinks Equity Markets piece, Growth or value? For active managers it can be both. All things considered, the evolving treatment of intangible assets may be one of the most impactful trends in the global economy, making them impossible to ignore.

Download Summary PDF [here](https://franklintempletonprod.widen.net/content/m7kl76qvqx/original/the-quiet-undertow-of-intangible-assets-summary-a.pdf)

Download Full PDF [here](https://franklintempletonprod.widen.net/content/btfdwsz34s/original/the-quiet-undertow-of-intangible-assets-a.pdf)

###### (1) Source: Analysis by Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, FactSet. As of 12/31/2020.

<br>

# Introduction

Our definition of assets and their economic value has been changing over time. In the 20th century, machines, factories, and transportation were the assets on a company’s balance sheet. Today, value is dominated by intangibles. Brands, technologies, patents, copyrights, synergies, and business models determine the lion’s share of company worth. At this point, 90% of the capitalization of the S&P 500 Index is accounted for by intangibles,(1) a huge jump from 36% in 1985. This paper builds on the technological innovation and taxation themes presented in Deep Water Waves, a paper (2) published by the Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, to explore the definition of intangible assets and draws conclusions on the implications for investors. Further, the paper dovetails with the Investment Institute’s Franklin Templeton Thinks Equity Markets piece, Growth or value? For active managers it can be both. (3) All things considered, the evolving treatment of intangible assets may be one of the most impactful trends in the global economy, making them impossible to ignore.

Below is a summary of the key points address in the full paper: 

- The rise of intangible assets has distorted the difference between value and growth investing. When balance sheets are adjusted for intangibles, “expensive” stocks
could appear to be “value” names. More intangible investments translate to higher, but uncertain, growth. Seemingly expensive companies with low profitability ratios and high intangible-intensity should not be automatically ruled out by true value strategies because, when a company proves the resilience of its business model, multiples can normalize.

- Thinking beyond the label of value and growth is critical. Passive portfolios with factor bets are now extremely vulnerable to changes of style categorization.

- Accounting standards have not kept pace and lead to inconsistent reporting and misclassification. Money spent on activities that create intangible assets is typically expensed, which leads to undercapitalization of intangibles and distorts traditional valuation metrics. This creates a widening valuation disparity between book value and market value. Solid and standardized environment, social and governance (ESG) frameworks will transform the way intangibles are captured on financial statements

- Intangible assets include brand and human capital which reflect how companies treat their people, communities, and the environment. Incorporation of wider
definitions of “quality” that include ESG factors will be critical in the newly emerging investment landscape.

- Further, current accounting practice may disincentivize management to make socially responsible investments, at a risk to environment, society, and the strategic position of their organizations.

- Many intangible-heavy firms will be affected by the ongoing international tax reform, e.g., around half the US tech names pay less than the proposed 15% minimum
global tax.(4)

- With the notable exceptions of South Korea and China, most emerging economies struggle to build strong research and development (R&D) networks. This tendency is unlikely to be reversed and constitutes a barrier to climbing the innovation ladder.

-  Collapsing antitrust enforcement can be seen as a prop for expansion of dominant companies. If successful, intangible investments can strengthen quasi-monopolistic
markets and concentration.

- The role of intangible assets will be enhanced in the future given progressing technological development, globalization, growing market sizes, the increasing role of
labor-intensive services, improving financial development, business friendly regulatory environment, and government support.

<br>

## IMPACTS ON VALUE AND GROWTH EQUITY CLASSIFICATIONS
Current accounting treatment’s failure to capture internally generated intangible assets has an impact on many topical themes. A better understanding of accounting nuances can shed light on the growth versus value debate. To put it simply, if intangibles are more fully considered, migrations of stocks between value and growth happen.

To illustrate our point, we adjusted the price-to-earnings multiple of the index representing growth stocks(5) by adding back our proxy of internally generated intangibles: 100% of R&D and 30% of selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses (see Research Methodology in Appendix of full paper). Interestingly, the adjustment makes the valuation of growth stocks look more in line with the standard valuation of the portfolio of value stocks.(6) While this is just preliminary analysis and further research will be needed, it highlights that incorporation of intangibles may significantly alter the current definitions of value and growth.

Active management strategies have been evolving and pure reliance on traditional accounting measures and their mean reverting properties is less common. Investors who require exposure to this traditional definition of value do it via indexing. Leading style indexes provide useful information about the relative performance of traditionally defined value and growth stocks and investment strategies based on such indexes can be profitable if executed nimbly. However, investors should be aware of the inherent limitations before making any investment decision.

<br>

## INTANGIBLES ARE A KEY ISSUE IN ONGOING GLOBAL TAX REFORM
2021 has brought some significant developments to international tax policy. The G7 (Group of Seven), a group of the world’s richest countries, agreed to make big multinational companies like Amazon, Meta Platforms FB and Google pay more tax in the countries where they are selling their products or services. The plan also backs a global minimum tax rate to limit tax competition between countries. Then, 130 OECD countries have also supported the initiative. Intangibles-heavy companies, or at least some of them(7) will undoubtedly be affected if the proposed changes come into effect. 

Intangible-intensity of multinational enterprises is a big part of the ongoing global tax reform. Intangible assets are easy to move around geographically. Hence, big companies can arbitrage differences in tax regimes. Increasingly, income from intangible sources has migrated to low-tax countries, allowing those companies to reduce their effective tax rates. 

<br>

## INTANGIBLE ASSETS ARE OFTEN STRONGLY CONNECTED WITH ESG GOALS

Intangible assets include brand and human capital, which reflect how companies treat their people, communities, and the environment, and how a company achieves its ESG investment goals. The shift towards an era of intellectual property makes the incorporation of relevant ESG factors crucial to the evaluation of a company.

Consumer and institutional investors’ preferences are evolving. The asset management industry needs to respond to this demand. Consequently, the prominence of sustainability-oriented investment has been accelerating over the last decade. In 2020, global sustainable investments reached more than US$35 trillion. Exhibit 12 portrays the growth of sustainable assets in five major regions. Growth has been steady everywhere but in. 

Predictably, growing intangible-intensity correlates with the widening adoption of ESG, as ESG can fill the value creation gap in financial reporting. Increased focus on the formation of intangible assets through ESG investments can improve the informational usefulness of sustainability reports. Further, the ESG value proposition can eventually transform a financial reporting system so that more intangibles are captured in financial statements.

Given the evolving macroeconomic backdrop and long-term investment drivers, companies will be under pressure to change at almost every level. Those that are good corporate citizens are already better placed for the changing consumer and investor preferences. 

The adoption of a wider definition of ‘quality’ that includes ESG factors will be critical in the newly emerging investment landscape.(8) Markets have been adopting socially responsible criteria which have largely benefited investors. However, accounting practices have not kept pace. A more readily implementable and standardized ESG framework is needed to further motivate companies to make responsible strategic decisions and to fill the value creation gap in financial reporting.

###### Endnotes
###### 1. Source: Analysis by Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, Factset. As of 12/31/2020.
###### 2. Source: as of September 2021, Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, Deep water waves.
###### 3. Source: See our paper, “Growth of Value? For active managers it can be both,” November 2021. Chief Market Strategist Stephen Dover is joined by five of our equity teams—each by one of our independent investment managers—offering their views that the traditional growth or value distinction for stocks based on index construction could be misleading, including the role intangibles may play in valuation processes.
###### 4. Source: Analysis by Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, Factset. As of 5/31/2021. The analysis is based on the constituents of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index and their effective tax rates for the last calendar year.
###### 5. Source: The MSCI USA Growth Index. Indexes are unmanaged, and one cannot invest directly in an index. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.
###### 6. Source: The MSCI USA Value Index. Indexes are unmanaged, and one cannot invest directly in an index. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.
###### 7. Precise analysis of winners and losers will be possible when the final shape of the deal is known. It may be hard to avoid loopholes. The current OECD framework sets profitability threshold percentage to 10%. For example, Amazon with its business model that depresses profitability ratios (6.3% pre-tax margin in 2020) can be let off the hook.
###### 8. Source: Kim Catechis, Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, Deep Water Waves, August 2021

###### **WHAT ARE THE RISKS?**
###### **All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested.** The positioning of a specific portfolio may differ from the information presented herein due to various factors, including, but not limited to, allocations from the core portfolio and specific investment objectives, guidelines, strategy and restrictions of a portfolio. There is no assurance any forecast, projection or estimate will be realized. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors actors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as the prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets, of which frontier markets are a subset, involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets. Because these frameworks are typically even less developed in frontier markets, as well as various factors including the increased potential for extreme price volatility, illiquidity, trade barriers and exchange controls, the risks associated with emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. Derivatives, including currency management strategies, involve costs and can create economic leverage in a portfolio which may result in significant volatility and cause the portfolio to participate in losses (as well as enable gains) on an amount that exceeds the portfolio’s initial investment. A strategy may not achieve the anticipated benefits, and may realize losses, when a counterparty fails to perform as promised. Currency rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time and can reduce returns. Investing in the natural resources sector involves special risks, including increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector—prices of such securities can be volatile, particularly over the short term. Impact investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) managers may take into consideration factors beyond traditional financial information to select securities, which could result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favor in the market. Further, ESG strategies may rely on certain values-based criteria to eliminate exposures found in similar strategies or broad market benchmarks, which could also result in relative investment performance deviating. Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.

###### **IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION**
###### This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton. The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the fi rm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verifi ed, validated or audited such data. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction. Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Distributors, LLC, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com - Franklin Distributors, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC, is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.

Deep Waves: The Quiet Undertow of Intangible Assets

large_LIT banner.jpg

medium_LIT banner.jpg

small_LIT banner.jpg

thumbnail_LIT banner.jpg

LIT banner.jpg

# About the Initative

Let’s Invest Together! (LIT!) is the culmination of significant cross-industry effort, with IMAS’ Gamification workgroup, collaborating with MoneySense, CPF Board, and the SGX Group, to accelerate Optimai, our fintech partner discovered through the IMAS Digital Accelerator Program (DAP). By leveraging on technology, and the mechanics of gamification, we have created a prototype of a fast-moving investment education game, available on iOS and Playstore, readily accessible to the investing public. 


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TRBCZukn7yo" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Given the evolution of the investor base, many of whom have become more digitally savvy, the IMAS Education Committee saw the opportunity in 2020 to leverage on gaming technology and the IMAS DAP to create a fun and exciting utility to help build investment knowledge amongst the investing community.

Utilising real data to simulate actual events, the game is uniquely able to help investors better understand how the various asset class interact, their risk profile and how their investment decisions can impact their portfolios, thereby improve their ability to asset allocate and build resilient investment portfolio for themselves.

##### Download the game now:

1. [Google Playstore](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.Optimai.LetsInvestTogether)
2. [Apple Store](https://apps.apple.com/app/lets-invest-together/id1576667625)

Let's Invest Together! (LIT!)

small_US stock market trader article.jpg

thumbnail_US stock market trader article.jpg

US stock market trader article.jpg

![US stock market trader article.jpg](/uploads/US_stock_market_trader_article_d88fc966e8.jpg)

Author: Valerio Baselli

Looking at the market today, it's easy to forget where we were at around 15 months ago. Many of the market declines of the past decade or so, including the stock market crash of 2008, are fast becoming faded memories for most of us. But it is the investors who endured these difficult times came out in perhaps the best shape, and as is often the case, those who had the nerve to stay invested were richly rewarded.

And yet, the decision about whether to change your investment strategy or sell a fund is usually not clear-cut, even in hindsight. After the dust has settled on a decision and the investment has performed well or poorly, the “right” answer is wholly dependent on the individual. Selling criteria are not a one-size-fits-all list that fit every investor, but there are some situations when selling is particularly ill-advised. Christine Benz, director of personal finance at Morningstar, picks these three key examples.

**Poor Short-Term Performance**
 
It’s almost never a good idea to sell a fund based on weak performance alone, especially over the short-term. You might have been tempted to sell in last year's market sell-off for example, but we now know the Covid crash was the shortest in history. Instead, if a fund is lagging its peers or an index, your first move should be to investigate why that is. It could be that the manager is simply sticking with an investment strategy that happens to be out of favour, as has been the case with many value-leaning funds in recent years. But weak performance may also be a sign that something more serious is afoot - Morningstar's own research has found that many active funds fail to beat the market over the long-term.

Researching an investment’s fundamentals can be time-consuming, which is why you don't want to get too caught up in investigating short-term bouts of underperformance. Most funds, especially those that are using truly active strategies, will trail their peers at times, often for very good reasons and sometimes for a few years or more (that could be the case with some perfectly solid, defensively positioned funds during a market rally, for example).

Instead, save your energy for checking up on funds when they've underperformed over longer stretches of time or in a period when you would have expected them to perform well. If, for example, you selected a fund because of its low-risk tendencies, but it lost far more than its peers in 2020, that's a legitimate reason to ask whether something about its strategy changed or its risk controls weren’t what you thought they were. And even if the fund isn’t bad, it may not be a good fit in your portfolio.

**Inconsistent Performance**

On a similar vein, investors often get themselves worked up when a fund’s relative returns are inconsistent on a year-to-year basis. Sure, it can be comforting to see a fund land in its category's top half like clockwork—and a small handful of funds has actually managed to generate return rankings that have been remarkably consistent from year to year.

But holding all of your funds to that standard would cause you to kick out some fine offerings that, while not consistent performers on a calendar-year basis, are consistent where it counts: they employ their strategies with discipline and don't waver, even if the market isn't rewarding them in the near term.

It's also important to remember that a calendar year is a fairly short and arbitrary time period, and a fund that has looked erratic over January-December time periods may appear perfectly consistent when measured over a different 12-month time frame—say, from April to March of each year. Investors shouldn't get too hung up on year-to-year performance consistency when deciding what to hold in their portfolios. Looking at annualised returns can be a better way to judge long-term performance, as these smooth out good and bad periods to indicate what average return an investor has received each year. 

**Macroeconomic News**

Macroeconomic news - whether it's the direction of interest rates, rising inflation or GDP growth in China and India - often appears right alongside news about the market's trajectory. And it's true that what's in the headlines has the potential to move the markets up or down on a daily basis, or even over longer time frames. The trouble is that by the time a certain news item makes its way into the headlines, other market participants have already digested it and priced it in.

If you decide to sell your fund based on that news, you're likely to be too late. Instead, a better tack for investors, at least as it relates to their portfolios, is to keep their heads down and focus on factors that they can control: their savings and spending rates, the quality of their investment holdings, and the total costs they pay for those investments. There is much virtue in tuning out the noise when it comes to managing your portfolio.





*©2021 Morningstar. All rights reserved. The information, data, analyses and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided as of the date written, solely for informational purposes; and subject to change at any time without notice. This content is not an offer to buy or sell any particular security and is not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The Morningstar name and logo are registered marks of Morningstar, Inc. This article includes proprietary materials of Morningstar; reproduction, transcription or other use, by any means, in whole or in part, without prior, written consent of Morningstar is prohibited. This article is intended for general circulation, and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. Investors should consult a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product, taking into account their specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making any investment decisions. Morningstar Investment Management Asia Limited is licensed and regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to provide investment research and investment advisory services to professional investors only. Morningstar Investment Adviser Singapore Pte. Limited is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore to provide financial advisory services in Singapore. Either Morningstar Investment Management Asia Limited or Morningstar Investment Adviser Singapore Pte. Limited will be the entity responsible for the creation and distribution of the research services described in this article.*

3 Bad Reasons to Sell a Fund

large_header-48.jpg

medium_header-48.jpg

small_header-48.jpg

thumbnail_header-48.jpg

header-48.jpg

![header-48.jpg](/uploads/header_48_f7dbb6ac83.jpg)

‘Doing (almost) nothing’ most advantageous for investors – according to newest NGFS climate scenario update
30 September 2022

Earlier this month the global central banking community, the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS¹¹), released its third vintage of climate scenarios for forward looking climate risks assessment.

At Ortec Finance we are passionate believers in the importance of integrating forward-looking climate analysis into investment decision-making. Therefore, we applaud NGFS’s efforts in socializing, designing and making readily available top-down climate scenarios. Nevertheless, an expert critical analysis of these scenarios remains important in order to challenge modeling methodologies and assumptions. How else to progress in the field?

In our [earlier article](https://www.ortecfinance.com/en/insights/blog/stargazing-or-have-the-ngfs-and-the-bank-of-england-missed-an-opportunity-to-drive-the-race-to-zero), we set out an extensive analysis of the strengths and limitations of the earlier NGFS climate scenario versions. Many of the comments made remain valid in respect to this latest update.

Key additions include:

- **Increased granularity of sectors** - Transport: Freight and Passengers, and Industry: Cement, High-value chemicals, Non-ferrous metals, Steel and Others
- **Physical risk GDP losses** have been doubled. GDP losses from chronic physical risks reach more than 6% in 2050, and up to 18% by the end of the century in the Current Policies scenario.
- **Acute physical risks** (cyclones and river flood) are now included but only translated to GDP.

These changes have resulted in quite different impacts from the earlier version. For example, the shock to equity is materially larger.

**However, our team at Ortec Finance, in collaboration with macro-modeling experts at our partner organization [Cambridge Econometrics](https://www.camecon.com/), remain concerned.**

When looking at US equity peross the 6 NGFrformance acS scenarios on a 30-year horizon, the Current Policies and the NDC scenarios show the best performance. They strongly outperform all the other 2 degrees and Net Zero scenarios. This is a harmful message and not a credible one. It points towards a continuing underappreciation of physical risks, and omission of likely market pricing-in and market volatility dynamics and modelling choices.

### Figure 1: Cumulative returns of US equities across NGFS climate scenarios
![chart.jpg](/uploads/chart_1bef62141a.jpg)

The points below explore the NGFS’s climate scenario limitations in more detail:
1. **Physical risk modelling remains problematic.** The literature used as a basis for NGFS slow onset event modelling is one of the most optimistic in its field . NGFS assumes physical risk to be linear, therefore completely side-stepping the issue of non-linear feedback loops and tipping points. Regarding the extreme weather modelling, a first step has been made, but effects have not yet been translated to financial impacts.
2. **No market risk considered.** The financial impacts shown in the NGFS scenarios capture only direct impacts and how they are expected to unfold in the real economy. They do not include a climate scenario narratives layer on how financial markets may react to transition- and physical risks materializing in the real world. Inclusion of market pricing-in dynamics and/or market sentiment shocks can significantly change the time horizon in which climate-related risks or opportunities become material to a portfolio’s risk and return implications.
3. **Macro-model choice.** Even though the NGFS states that it reflects ‘the uncertainty inherent to modelling climate related macroeconomic and financial risks’ the NGFS scenarios only look at general equilibrium model results. Non-equilibrium models - which are models recognised for being better suited to capture the dynamics of economies in transition – have not been considered. For more information on equilibrium vs non-equilibrium models please refer our publication in The Actuary magazine [here](https://www.theactuary.com/2022/03/01/under-bonnet-different-economic-engines-drive-climate-change-scenario-models).

In addition to the main points above, the scenarios are rife with inconsistencies and unclarities we cannot bring home. A couple of examples:

ּּ• Carbon prices are lower in Phase 3 transition scenarios compared with Phase 2 – in 2050 the carbon price in the previous Delayed transition scenario reaches over USD (2010) 600 t/CO2 while it approaches USD (2010) 400 t/CO2 now. Without further information it is unclear how temperature outcomes are maintained while policy ambitions are dialled down.
ּּ• The global CO2 emissions trajectory in the Current Policies scenario is almost flat between now and 2040, which is highly unlikely given a strong economic growth and a relatively weak set of short-term decarbonisation policies currently implemented.

In view of the above we would recommend that the NGFS:
ּּ• Reflect on the danger of the overall messaging delivered via these climate scenarios that are likely to be widely accepted and used by financial institutions around the world. Do Central Banks really intend to signal complacency when it comes to portfolios’ climate risk exposure?
ּּ• Reassesses the appropriateness of its slow onset physical risk modelling to ensure that it better reflects the full range of uncertainty.
ּּ• Supply detailed narrative descriptions of the scenarios to correctly understand, interpret and apply the scenarios in business and financial analyses and nuanced decision-making.
ּּ• Provide sensitivity analysis of the scenario results to provide insights into the key assumptions that move the dial on reaching low carbon outcomes.

¹ The NGFS scenarios are based on a climate related damage function estimated by Kalkuhl, M. & Wenz, L.: The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 103, 102360 (2020). There is a wide range of publications on the estimation of climate related damage functions, all of which provide a lower bound of likely damages due to methodological and data constraints (eg. no climate tipping points taken into account), but among those, the Kalkuhl & Wenz (2020) provides a relatively small damage estimate. We think the Burke, M. and V. Tanutama: Climatic Constraints on Aggregate Economic Output, Working Paper 25779, National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2019 provides a better estimate, which also implies larger economic damages due to temperature rise. A good literature review with cross-comparisons is provided by Piontek, F. at al.: Integrated perspective on translating biophysical to economic impacts of climate change, Nature Climate Change, Vol 11, July 2021.

![ces-compass.png](/uploads/ces_compass_cdd891440d.png)

Ortec Finance’s [**Climate & ESG Solutions**](https://www.ortecfinance.com/en/solutions/climate-esg-solutions) deliver state-of-the-art customizable solutions for climate resilient investment decision-making by combining independent, research-backed climate & ESG knowledge, advanced financial models, and innovative technology.

[**Climate MAPS**](https://www.ortecfinance.com/en/insights/product/climate-maps) quantifies your portfolio's exposure to systemic climate-related financial risks & opportunities across different climate scenarios. This enables investors to consistently integrate climate risk into risk-management, strategic asset allocation and asset liability management for investment decision-making.

When it comes to investors, we recommend they ensure that they are well versed in climate-scenario methodologies and associated assumptions in order to ensure well informed use of these tools. For more information, please contact us below.

![ortect-finance1.jpg](/uploads/ortect_finance1_11657515e9.jpg)

Email: contact@ortecfinance.com

![ortect-finance2.jpg](/uploads/ortect_finance2_9f9fbd7766.jpg)

Email: contact@ortecfinance.com










Stargazing II

small_SGX ESGenome_800 x 250px.jpg

thumbnail_SGX ESGenome_800 x 250px.jpg

SGX ESGenome_800 x 250px.jpg

![SGX ESGenome_800 x 250px.jpg](/uploads/SGX_ES_Genome_800_x_250px_fac164bdf9.jpg)

[SGX ESGenome](https://www.sgx.com/sustainable-finance/esgenome), a digital disclosure portal for companies to report Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) data in a structured and efficient manner, and for investors to access such data in a consistent and comparable format, was launched in September 2022.

SGX ESGenome enables companies to report metrics aligned with global standards and frameworks, ensuring regulatory compliance that meets investor needs for consistent and comparable ESG data.

It is one of the four digital platforms of [Project Greenprint](https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/News/Media-Releases/2021/Infographic_MAS-Project-Greenprint.pdf) by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), a culmination of MAS and SGX’s efforts to simplify, standardise and improve corporate disclosures, as well as enhance stakeholder access and use of consistent and comparable ESG data.

SGX ESGenome is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provided for SGX-listed companies at no cost as it aims to support companies in ESG-related disclosures, data collection, tracking and reporting

Companies will have access to the list of [SGX Core ESG Metrics](https://www.sgx.com/regulation/sustainability-reporting#SGX%20Core%20ESG%20Metrics) which is mapped to global standards and frameworks. The list of SGX Core ESG Metrics was published in 2021 to promote the alignment between reporting parties and users of ESG information, allowing for greater consistency and comparability across companies and sectors.

SGX ESGenome also offers more than 3,000 other ESG metrics that are mapped across global standards and frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Companies may also choose to create other custom metrics that are industry/company specific. 

Key features of the platform include:

•	Framework agnostic platform with metrics mapped across global ESG reporting standards and frameworks including GRI, TCFD, SDG, to meet with different requirements

•	Access to SGX Core ESG Metrics and over 3,000 global ESG metrics with guidance on disclosure

•	Create custom/bespoke metrics that are industry or company specific

•	Monitor your ESG performance over time, and view insights and analytics on the platform

•	Download ESG datasets in a structured format

•	Assign multiple accesses for internal stakeholders as part of your regular sustainability reporting, ESG data collection and tracking process

•	Option to select data/information to be kept private as part of an internal workflow management tool

•	Auto-generate sustainability reports within the platform


For investors and financial institutions, SGX ESGenome will provide access to relevant and comparable ESG data that allows for meaningful peer benchmarking and tracking of sustainability commitments. This enables capital to be mobilised more efficiently toward sustainable companies and projects. 

MAS noted that it will also draw on the learnings from ESGenome to address the reporting needs of the broader universe of corporates, notably small and medium-sized enterprises, and supply chain partners and suppliers, as part of its ongoing work on Project Greenprint.

The initiative is supported and welcomed by many industry partners. Click [here](https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/2022-09-12-ESGenome%20press%20release-SGX-FINAL.ashx?App=Announcement&FileID=731313) to read quotes by the following partners: The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS), Investment Management Association of Singapore (IMAS), Securities Association of Singapore (SAS), SGListCos, Sustainability Reporting Advisory Committee (SRAC) and Ernest & Young.











Launch of SGX ESGenome Disclosure Portal to streamline sustainability reporting and enhance access to ESG data

large_stacs-image1.jpg

medium_stacs-image1.jpg

small_stacs-image1.jpg

thumbnail_stacs-image1.jpg

stacs-image1.jpg

![stacs-image1.jpg](/uploads/stacs_image1_f01ff5df04.jpg)

Author: Benjamin Soh, Co-Founder & Managing Director, STACS

It’s becoming crystal clear that for the finance industry to make good decisions in terms of capital allocation to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assets, we will need to improve transparency and trust at the data level.

Asset managers are getting savvy to the need for better screening and scoring of everything in the ESG universe, as well as understanding the data they are receiving from ESG data providers while using more of their own analytics capabilities to project out into the future.

One of the remaining challenges is an over-reliance on publicly available non-financial ESG data, with what’s available in the private sector typically far more fragmented and non-transparent, making it hard for institutions and asset managers operating in private markets when it comes to ESG screening.

## Financial market modeling needs better ESG data

In addition, there is a lack of real-time ESG data, with much of it being historic in nature due to reporting happening once or, at best, twice a year.

As capital allocation decisions are based on complex models that make assumptions on future outlooks based on present data, this lack of transparency around ESG data makes it very difficult to accurately predict the future in these areas and therefore to be effective capital allocators.

In particular, we have observed that large asset managers are at more of a disadvantage versus banks and insurers who are more likely to have confidential/non-public data available from their expansive customer bases.

However, with much of today’s asset allocation being done by the large asset managers such as BlackRock and Vanguard, who between them manage nearly $20 trillion in assets, it is clear the ESG data situation could lead to some less-than-optimal capital allocation decisions.

## Truly efficient markets need gold data standards

This, potentially, undermines the very idea of efficient markets as more and more investments are being screened for ESG criteria using sub-optimal data.

Beyond just the accessibility of data, there is another headache on the horizon: no “single source of truth”, something the blockchain was originally created to help address.

We believe [STACS](https://stacs.io/) can be an upstream data partner to the ESG ratings agencies, many of whom are also grappling with the challenge of a lack of public data and single source of truth but whose clients (the asset managers) are looking to them to help solve.

An analysis of 62 of the largest asset managers worldwide found that most use between two and five different ratings providers and some even use up to 10 different third-party vendors to cover their ESG data needs, according to EY.

Alternative data sources will become increasingly important in the desired goal of reliable real-time ESG data through technologies such as satellites, IoT, and drones that offer insights into supply chains, production (i.e. agriculture), and transportation networks.

ESGpedia - Enhancing Trust in ESG Data and Finance

![Dr-Darian-at-Greenprint-Industry-Showcase-Event.jpg](/uploads/Dr_Darian_at_Greenprint_Industry_Showcase_Event_fa5110e38c.jpg)

Dr Darian McBain, chief sustainability officer of MAS, was the guest of honour at the Project Greenprint industry showcase event, where ESGpedia was launched.

[ESGpedia](https://esgpedia.io/), officially launched on 18 May 2022 at the Project Greenprint Industry Showcase event held at Google, powers the ESG Registry of Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) Project Greenprint. 

There’s a profound disconnect between the ESG data financial institutions and companies need, and what is available to them.

Serving both financial institutions and corporates, ESGpedia aims to provide two gold standards for asset managers: that single source of truth we have been talking about, as well as holistic ongoing project data and ESG certifications across multiple sectors, shining a light on both public and private companies.

First of its type, ESGpedia aggregates all ESG efforts and provides the necessary digital tools for effective ESG finance, bridging the gap in ESG data and finance where there is no other such platform today.

**Dr Darian McBain, Chief Sustainability Officer at MAS**, said, “The launch of the blockchain-based ESGpedia platform establishes a robust base for powering the Greenprint ESG Registry, combining STACS’ work on aggregating high quality ESG data from multiple certification bodies and verified sources, with the ability for financial institutions, corporates, and regulators to access this trusted data via a single source in accordance with their needs. In time, data housed in the Greenprint ESG Registry will form a central pillar that underpins the financial sector’s effective mobilisation of capital towards sustainable projects, as well as the accurate tracking and quantification of emission reductions, abatement levels, and other sustainability KPIs linked with these projects.”  

Companies going green need easier access to ESG financing, while financiers with idle capital can leverage on more insightful data to better allocate funds to ESG effectively. 

We invite financial institutions and corporates large and small to get in touch with us if you’re interested to navigate the opportunities in going green via ESG data and technology – only together we can make good progress towards solving the ESG data puzzle and truly enable effective sustainable finance for the industry. 

Read the press release [here](https://stacs.io/esgpedia-officially-launches-aggregating-verified-esg-data-and-certifications-across-various-sectors-to-enable-more-effective-green-finance/).

Sign up for a trial of [ESGpedia](https://esgpedia.io/)

[Watch financial institution partners comment on ESGpedia and how it enables holistic ESG data to support Green Finance](https://youtu.be/JufEFPT0hJg)


Why data remains the biggest ESG investing challenge for asset managers

Ed Perks, Chief Investment Officer of Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions discusses how rapidly changing economic and market conditions could lead to a shift in strategy for income investors.

Increasing Yields: Strategy Shifts for Income Investors

Does investing in ESG hurt investment returns? Are ESG portfolios only concerned with saving the environment? AllianceBernstein's Aditya Monappa tackles these myths and answers investors' burning questions.

Beyond catchy taglines: Navigating ESG investing with AllianceBernstein

In the second episode of a four-part series, we explore briefly how the pandemic has prompted Singaporeans to kickstart retirement planning. 

"Rethinking Retirement" is a study commissioned by Fullerton Fund Management to find out what Singaporeans think about retirement, as well as how digital technologies and COVID-19 have altered their approach to it. 

Impact of COVID 19 on retirement planning

A joint initiative of IMAS and LIA